Ubiquity vs. Deadzone - Permanet, Nearlynet, and Wireless Data

| | Comments (1) | TrackBacks (0)

Shirky: Permanet, Nearlynet, and Wireless Data
Good article. Worse is better?

Call the first network "perma-net," a world where connectivity is like air, where anyone can send or receive data anytime anywhere. Call the second network "nearly-net", an archipelago of connectivity in an ocean of disconnection. Everyone wants permanet -- the providers want to provide it, the customers want to use it, and every few years, someone announces that they are going to build some version of it. The lesson of in-flight phones is that nearlynet is better aligned with the technological, economic, and social forces that help networks actually get built. The most illustrative failure of permanet is the airphone. The most spectacular was Iridium. The most expensive will be 3G.

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Ubiquity vs. Deadzone - Permanet, Nearlynet, and Wireless Data.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://kennethhunt.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/704

1 Comments

aravind said:

The most illustrative failure of permanet is the airphone. The most spectacular was Iridium. The most expensive will be 3G.

VEry well said.Wow the best quote I have seen for days.
Aravind

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by klsh published on March 29, 2003 12:30 PM.

Ergonomic Computing On A Macro Scale was the previous entry in this blog.

Search A Movable Type page from Phoenix is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.